Skip to content

The Purpose and Process of Discipleship

May 6, 2010

“All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”
Matthew 28:18-20

The Command
Jesus commanded his followers to make disciples. This is an all-encompassing command. It is not merely one command among several, but the goal of the other commands. We evangelize, gather to worship, teach & preach the Word, gather in community, and show mercy, all for the purpose of making disciples. If we are not making lifelong disciples of Jesus, we are doing the wrong things. We are likely building with wood, hay, and straw. But if we are making disciples, then what we do will last for eternity, and result in greater glory to God, and greater joy and reward in heaven.

The Question
Therefore, everything we do must be evaluated by the question of “How does this make disciples?”  If done rightly, we will evaluate every program, every meeting, every event, every expenditure, and even every staff position, by asking how it serves to make disciples. Some things will be affirmed and bolstered. Others will need to be tweaked. And some will need to be axed. Good things may need to be eliminated if they don’t serve the goal of making disciples.

Discipleship is not only our purpose, but should also be our process. Our purpose and process should be one and the same. This is the “Simple Church” ethos in a nutshell: that your purpose statement not only tells people what you’re about, but also how to get there.
Even if we generally do a good job at communicating our purpose to those we minister to, this doesn’t magically appear as a clear plan for discipleship.  If it doesn’t, we’ll see the fallout from our failure to adequately disciple in at least four areas.

The Fallout
1. Instead of Clarity, Confusion: There is great confusion about how we want to see people grow in their walk, because we haven’t had a plan, and we haven’t communicated anything consistently or coherently. People expect more from our Home Meetings or Sunday worship than we can currently give. They grope around for books or other venues for discipleship.

2. Instead of Movement, Paralysis: After large group or gathering events, we lack clear ways to help people grow. We don’t keep them moving, keep them growing in their walk. Spiritual growth becomes stifled. People remain in immature states for a long time. New believers (and old believers) fall away. Those who are committed lack the necessary Gospel foundation for their service, and predictably burn out.
3. Instead of Alignment, “Subluxation”: Even young, anti-programmatic ministries discover how easy it is to jump to the latest thing or pet project. We find that our passions and burdens are sometimes working at cross-purposes, but we lack the mechanisms to bring our efforts into alignment. Thus we feel that we’re pushing really hard, but because we’re sometimes pushing against each other and not in the same direction, we’re not really getting anywhere.
4. Instead of Focus, “Church ADHD”: We don’t know why we do some things, & why we don’t do others. We don’t know why we used to do things that we don’t do now. We don’t even have clear criteria for what gets announced and promoted. We ask the wrong questions when we decide about potential events or efforts: “Can we pull this off?” instead of “how does this serve our purpose of making disciples?” No wonder we feel spread too thin. We’re constantly busy, but lack focus in what we do.

The net impact of this fallout is that leaders and staff suffer from the same confusion, paralysis, subluxation, and ADHD as everyone else.
Consequently, we need to ensure that we are making disciples. Only when we do so will our efforts become worthwhile, and we’ll have something worth reproducing.

We Need a Plan
We need a plan to make disciples. The plan should be clear. It should be simple, easy to explain, easy to remember, & preferably easy to illustrate. Simple is good. It is not the same as simplistic. A simple discipleship process will be identical to our purpose.

The plan should facilitate movement. This means it needs defined stages, so that everyone knows where they (and others) stand, and where they’re going. It’s not enough to simply tell people “get involved in a small group.” It’s not enough to tell people we want to make disciples. We need to tell them how we plan on doing that, & how to get there.  Therefore good plans should be sequential: the next stage flows out of the previous one. I’ll be fleshing that out tomorrow.
The plan should lead to alignment, to everyone pulling in the same direction.
The plan should, at some point, lead to the evaluation of everything that we do, and result in bolstering in some things and eliminating others. We will commit to only doing a few things, doing them in the right place and the right order, and doing them well.

8 Comments leave one →
  1. Logan permalink
    May 6, 2010 1:16 pm

    I’m looking forward to you rolling out the plan. I have some thoughts on discipleship that I’ll be formulating into a blog myself soon.

    Mainly, when it comes to missional communities, it seems that it can be THE mechanism for discipleship. But too often discipleship is seen as a program of knowledge download/seminary training separate from active ministry.

    This results in people invested in a variety of ministries and then being discipled by someone outside of that ministry. I like what you said about alignment and am anxious to see how you roll that out.

    All that to say, looking forward to tomorrow.

    • May 7, 2010 10:21 am

      Thanks Logan–looking forward to your thoughts. You’ll see I still didn’t get to the actual nuts and bolts today in terms of process!

  2. May 7, 2010 6:42 am

    Steve, I was in an elder meeting earlier this week and we spent a fair amount of time on this topic. Looking forward to seeing what you have to say. Your mention of “Simple Church” must be a reference to the book by Rainer and Geiger.

    • May 7, 2010 10:21 am

      Ian–yes, I’m referring to that book. I think it’s great at focusing and clarifying what you’re about.

  3. May 8, 2010 11:20 am

    Maybe I’m not completely understanding what you’re saying, but I struggle with a “make disciples” command as the umbrella command vs. the “glorify God” command as the umbrella command.

    Without diving into all the possible commands that don’t seem to actually make disciples as an end product, these few come to mind:

    -Enjoyment / Party (Eccl. 9, et al.)
    -Spiritual disciplines (not teaching others spiritual disciplines, but actually practicing them myself – is the PRIMARY goal of my Scripture reading actually to make disciples? What about my private worship?)
    -Sleep
    -Service (which you mention, but I struggle with the assumption that ALL service – every single instance – must have an actual disciplemaking component, or it’s not worthy of our time)

    That comes to mind. Clarification? What am I missing?

    Also, while I completely understand what you’re saying, I’d be careful about your broad “we” statements. College ministry as a whole does need to work on Movement / Process. But there are MANY great examples of college ministries that do it far better than the church-at-large seems to. It comes fairly naturally with our standard large-group/small-group structures, and emphases (like the Win-Build-Send) you mention in the next post are shining examples of this.

    • May 10, 2010 2:10 pm

      Benson–yeah, fair point. I am of course a confessional Presbyterian, including our famous answer in the shorter catechism to “What is the chief end of man?” “A: To glorify God and enjoy him forever.” So yes, I affirm that the umbrella is to do that, or in the words of the two great commandments, to love God and love others.

      I think the trick is to look at HOW that gets worked out, because “glorify God” can be pretty nebulous in the nitty-gritty of everyday life, which I think is one reason Piper famously changed the prepositional phrasing of the shorter catechism.

      WAY up there in the “hierarchy” of commands, if we can speak of such a thing, is the command to make disciples. Thinking in terms of complex/organic systems would lead us to not have any dualisms. Roots of a tree soak up water, for the purposes of health and growth. But healthy things produce fruit (or disciples). In the same way, healthy disciples will make the activities you mention above (yes, even sleep) part of their life, and part of their disciple-making.

      (Speaking of sleep, I remember reading in Billy Graham’s autobiography how he lost a lot of sleep during one particularly intense Crusade–in the short-term he ministered to more people, but he said he “lost something” that he never got back, physically.).

      As far as the broad “we” statements, I’m not saying that everyone’s guilty, but as a generalization I’m asserting it’s generally true. So if the shoe fits…
      Also, I’d take issue with a couple aspects of how it’s implemented. 1) Simply because the process is articulated doesn’t mean it actually happens, and I think Win/Build/Send is an example of this. 2) I’m concerned that Win/Build/Send is more of a factory/industrial model, as opposed to the complex/organic model. Which has me thinking about what will probably be a separate post.

      Thanks for the feedback!

Trackbacks

  1. Steve Lutz on Discipleship « Shake This Generation
  2. Factory Farming or Free Range Discipleship? « the SENTinel

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers